Why ADP Does Not Publish Sensitive Information or Provide Documents Publicly
Before contacting us, we respectfully request that you read this notice carefully. Our operational model and the nature of our work require strict confidentiality and controlled disclosure of information. Although our platform has maintained a successful and uninterrupted record since 2001, we do not publicly release completed projects, work history, ongoing projects, annual financial reports, partner bank names, or transaction details. This policy exists for several critical legal, financial, and security reasons:
1. Low Profile – Zero Risk
A high public profile invites unnecessary exposure, negative competition, and personal security risks. The more visible an organization becomes, the more it is forced into restrictive security measures that affect normal life and operations. ADP does not seek fame; we seek service. Our reputation is built on 24 years of clean performance without a single negative case in either public or private sectors. Our clients trust us because we protect integrity, not publicity.
2. Protection Against Fraud, Misuse, and Impersonation
Global fraud and document misuse have reached unprecedented levels. Publishing sensitive information exposes our platform, our clients, and our banking partners to impersonation, forged guarantees, and fraudulent activities. The following global statistics (2025–2026) demonstrate the severity of the threat:
– 6% of all processed documents in 2025 were confirmed fraudulent (1 in 16).
– 1 in 3 documents showed signs of tampering or manipulation.
– High-risk document fraud increased by 28.5% year-over-year.
– Professional multi-layer fraud increased by 180% (2024–2025).
– Serial fraud attempts increased 7x in 2025.
– AI-generated document fraud increased 90x (2025–2026).
– Deepfake identity attacks reached 62% of organizations (Gartner 2025).
– Deepfake fraud attempts increased 700% (Sumsub 2024–2025).
– Biometric spoofing attacks increased 741% (iProov 2026).
– Internet-based platform impersonation increased 5x in 2025.
– Corporate brand impersonation increased 34% globally.
– PPP scam attempts increased 52%.
– Cybercrime losses reached $16.6 billion (FBI IC3 – 2024).
– Synthetic identity fraud exceeded $20 billion (Federal Reserve – 2025).
– 41% of platform impersonation cases involved forged bank letters.
– 29% of SBLC/BG documents submitted online were fake or altered.
These numbers clearly show why ADP must protect its documents and identity from misuse.
3. Preventing Arranged or Leased Guarantees Based on Our Documents
Many scammers and unregulated brokers attempt to use the reputation, documents, or projects history of credible platforms to create arranged guarantees, leased SBLCs, or fabricated banking instruments such as:
– Financial Stream Guarantees
– RBS Guarantees
– Master Guarantee Facilities
– Contract-Backed Guarantees
– Receivable-Backed Guarantees
– Trade Credit Insurance Guarantees
– Forfaiting-Based Guarantees
– Platform or Facilitator Value-Backed Guarantees
None of these instruments are legally valid under international banking law. They are created based on the platform’s reputation, not on real collateral. ADP and nearly all regulated platforms have repeatedly faced such misuse. To prevent this from ever happening again, ADP does not share its work history, financial credibility, or project details with anyone applicant, nor do we publish them on our website.
Only when a qualified client issues a genuine and verifiable Pre-Advice (MT-799), ADP through its bank provides official confirmation of project funding according to the contract. This ensures that the client can confidently issue a real, callable, and compliant banking guarantee (MT-760) without risk.
This policy protects both ADP and our clients from fraud, misuse, impersonation, and illegal financial activities. It is a core part of our compliance with international banking regulations, IMF standards, FATF AML rules, PPP Union and UNECE PPP governance.